Category Archives: ARCHIVE BLOGGERY

Consent

Here’s part of an encouraging article by Sarah Estrella for Examiner.com:

‘Where does consent begin and end in the eyes of the law when it comes to rough sex involving dominance and submission play?

Should adults engaging in consensual sexual behavior be subject to criminal laws including assault and battery? What local, state, or federal laws could be used against you for engaging in consensual BDSM activity? What does consent mean, who can give it, and what are its limits? How do we distinguish between consensual BDSM and domestic violence or abuse when such matters come before our law enforcement officials and enter into the court system? What are the boundaries of consent and sexual freedom?

This week on Tuesday October 19 the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom brings its Consent Counts project to San Francisco for a presentation on BDSM (bondage, discipline, sadism, masochism) and the law featuring presentations by NCSF’s Judy Guerin and Richard Cunningham, Esq. The discussion on decriminalizing BDSM will be held at 7pm at the Law Offices of Alex Austin & Shannan Rapoport, 799 Castro Street. Please RSVP to Judy Guerin at judy@ncsfreedom.org or 202-494-9555.

Through the Consent Counts project, the NCSF aims to decriminalize consensual BDSM behavior by creating “legal language that clarifies consensual BDSM is not the intent or purpose of laws such as battery if the behavior is between consenting adults.”

Via NCSF.wordpress.com:

The National Coalition for Sexual Freedom is a national organization committed to creating a political, legal, and social environment in the United States that advances equal rights of consenting adults who practice forms of alternative sexual expression. NCSF is primarily focused on the rights of consenting adults in the SM-leather-fetish, swing, and polyamory communities, who often face discrimination because of their sexual expression.

The Consent Counts project began in 2007 at the National Gay & Lesbian Task Force’s Creating Change conference, and was announced as a major project of the NCSF in August 2009…’

Full article here.

Thrill of the Chaste

Over the past decade or so, I have discovered just what a powerful aphrodisiac chastity can be – just not in the way I had previously thought.

When I was young, I assumed that it was only female chastity that set a chap’s heart racing. After all, I spent much of my teens hearing the blokiest of blokes in the playground, the pub and the pulpit preach that only the most innocent, sexless, blank page of a girl would be up to the job of lover, wife and mother to his children. It’s what society tells a man he is supposed to desire – a woman with no desires of her own.

However, since growing up and immersing myself in BDSM, I’ve discovered that things aren’t nearly as simple for real people. Chastity is a complicated thrill. There are many aspects that sexually excite, but they are rarely the most obvious. One in particular, and one I’ve encountered many a time, is the illicit frisson many gents get when told not to fiddle with themselves.

We’ve all been taught that when a girl says no to sex with a boy, he tends to want it all the more because he can’t have it. Yes, it’s about chastity, but it’s more about his chastity than hers. BDSM takes this and makes it explicit: When a dominant woman tells a susceptible submissive that he can’t have her, it can be maddeningly arousing for him, but when she tells him that he can’t have himself either, he can be walking around with a torturous tent in his trousers for days on end.

If you order a human being not to think about sex, it’s the first thing they think of, just like ordering a smoker not to think of cigarettes and – in this case – ordering a wanker not to masturbate. And much as we’re not all smokers, the vast majority of human beings are wankers. It’s a natural urge.

So anyway, I wasn’t surprised to hear of the sudden political success of Tea Party candidate Christine O’Donnell. From nowhere, this right-wing lunatic took 53% of the Republican primary vote in Delaware. She would have been almost indistinguishable from the other gun-toting, gay-hating, evolution-bashing rabble of proto-Palins, were it not for her telling the men of America, in a soft, seductive voice, not to masturbate. That’s right. The thing O’Donnell is most notable for is her stance on wanking. During the ’90s, she was president of Christian group, “Saviors Alliance for Lifting the Truth” (SALT) which campaigned for abstinence, specifically teaching people that masturbation is a sin.

“The Bible says lust in your heart is committing adultery,” she said on an MTV interview in 1996, lips painted a shade of deep red. “So, you can’t masturbate without lust. The reason that you don’t tell [teenagers] that masturbation is the answer to AIDS and all these other problems that come with sex outside of marriage is because again it is not dressing [sic] the issue.”

Gentlemen, put that in your pipe and refrain from smoking it.