Category Archives: BLOGGERY: politics, religion & brain purges……

Dehumanising?

In Scotland, things could soon be changing. Of course, we don’t agree with trafficking, coercion or any other form of exploitative or consensually-dubious sex work, but to dismiss an entire industry with these labels and – even worse – to criminalise it all as a result of misinformation is counterproductive. Ethical sex, porn, titillation and kink is too often lumped in with crime and cruelty by lazy politicians and half-arsed journalism. Sex worker rights are important, and what Rhoda Grant MSP is proposing really doesn’t help.

Here’s a post by Laura Lee at Escort Scotland:

“Rhoda Grant MSP believes that ‘prostitution in Scotland is a form of sexual violence against women and sexual exploitation.’ She believes that ‘prostitution is inherently harmful and dehumanising’ and that ‘the majority of those who are involved in prostitution are unwilling participants.’ She is proposing to make it illegal to purchase sex in Scotland.

Now, I know, and you know, that her assertions are simply not true. I know from years of experience at various levels in the sex industry that in fact the vast majority of sex workers are working (quite contentedly) of their own volition and to support themselves and their families. Indeed, my colleagues and I have been visiting brothels so we know the truth, and we think it’s time that the truth is told.

The public consultation on Rhoda Grant’s proposals for a new law to criminalise the purchase of sex is open until 14th December. This is an open consultation – you do not have to be a resident of Scotland or the UK to respond.

All of us at SCOT-PEP have been campaigning to stop this law going through and we will continue to do so but we need YOU to use your voice too.

Are you a sex worker, a client or an individual interested in human rights and safety for sex workers? Politicians need to know the realities of sex work, so let’s tell them!

If you are a sex worker and enjoy your job, if you do not feel exploited or that it is dehumanising, harmful or degrading, SAY SO.

If you choose to work as a sex worker because it is the best available option for you, SAY SO.

If you see disabled clients who would otherwise never experience the joy of skin to skin contact, SAY SO.

If you feel that making it illegal for your clients to pay you is not going to tackle trafficking or ‘reduce demand’ but deprive you of a living, SAY SO.

If you are a client, who uses the services of sex workers and have yet to find a victim of coercion or trafficking, SAY SO.

If you work in health services and come into contact with sex workers who don’t fit *that* stereotype, SAY SO.

Here’s what you can do.

You can write to Rhoda Grant and tell her what you think of her proposals.

The consultation document asks specifically for answers to 8 questions – but you can also just write in with your opinion if you prefer. Your letter will be much more powerful if you can add your own views and experiences, although at Scot-PEP we have prepared some template letters here which you can use as a guideline for your own letter. In fact you can simply print the letters off and sign them.

You don’t need to use your real name, for example you can use your work name or an alias to send in your opinion. If you do use your own name you must ask for your response to be treated as anonymous if you do not wish your name to be published on Rhoda Grant’s website and by the Scottish Parliament. (Only names will be published – not contact addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses etc.)

You can email your letter to: Rhoda.Grant.msp@scottish.parliament.uk

or post it to:

Rhoda Grant MSP
Room M1.06
Scottish Parliament
Edinburgh
EH99 1SP

It has never been more important to stand up for your rights and to have your voice heard. Please don’t let this new proposal drive our already clandestine and stigmatised jobs further underground and please don’t allow politicians to tell you how you feel or how you ought to live your life. Enough is enough.”

For original post, click here.

IC Dead People

At some point around the turn of the millennium, my first tentative tiptoes into the internet led me to a website called Informed Consent, recommended by a dungeon monitor I met at a club night. Through IC, directly and indirectly, I’ve met some of the most wonderful and important people in my life. There have been enlightening discussions, dramas, trolls and tribulations. Now, sadly, it’s nearly over. Today at 6:57pm, Admin posted this:

“IC was started during the Christmas holidays of 1997, and has gone through several stages of evolution over the years. From the start, it had a thread of activism, as reflected in the name which stresses the consensual and legitimate nature of what we do. Even publishing BDSM listings was part of that activism in those days, as it was created when publications like Time Out and the Guardian refused to take BDSM ads, and it was genuinely hard to find people, shops, and events. But now we’re in a world where daytime TV talks about “Fifty Shades of Grey”, and sites like Facebook, FetLife, Twitter, Pinterest, and WordPress make it easy for people to network and to talk about their BDSM ideas, or their business, or their event. So there are a lot of alternatives now, and we’ve taken the hard decision to close www.informedconsent.co.uk in February next year. There are several reasons for this, some of which we can’t talk about. We have looked at other options for the site to continue but none of them are both practical and consistent with our aims and values. Informed Consent as a project will continue as an activism site which will be developed using informedconsent.org.uk, and with the InformedConsent Twitter feed and Informed Consent activism and news group on FetLife. We’re also going to try to resinstate our Facebook page. The timetable is that www.informedconsent.co.uk will close at the end of Sunday 24th February 2013, with posts to the boards, groups, and blogs finishing at the end of Sunday 17th February 2013. The archive of posts made to the boards etc will be maintained as part of the informedconsent.org.uk site. If there’s anything you’d like to save from your profile, in particular pictures and blog posts, you will need to download them from IC before 24th February. We’d like to say a huge thank you to everyone who has made positive contributions to the site over the years, either by helping to maintain it, test it, donate to it, sponsor pages on it, or post on it.”

RIP IC.

Brave New World

On 21st October 1949, Huxley wrote to Orwell on politics, sadism and hypnosis (via the excellent “Letters of Note” blog):

“Dear Mr. Orwell,

It was very kind of you to tell your publishers to send me a copy of your book. It arrived as I was in the midst of a piece of work that required much reading and consulting of references; and since poor sight makes it necessary for me to ration my reading, I had to wait a long time before being able to embark on Nineteen Eighty-Four.

Agreeing with all that the critics have written of it, I need not tell you, yet once more, how fine and how profoundly important the book is. May I speak instead of the thing with which the book deals — the ultimate revolution? The first hints of a philosophy of the ultimate revolution — the revolution which lies beyond politics and economics, and which aims at total subversion of the individual’s psychology and physiology — are to be found in the Marquis de Sade, who regarded himself as the continuator, the consummator, of Robespierre and Babeuf. The philosophy of the ruling minority in Nineteen Eighty-Four is a sadism which has been carried to its logical conclusion by going beyond sex and denying it. Whether in actual fact the policy of the boot-on-the-face can go on indefinitely seems doubtful. My own belief is that the ruling oligarchy will find less arduous and wasteful ways of governing and of satisfying its lust for power, and these ways will resemble those which I described in Brave New World. I have had occasion recently to look into the history of animal magnetism and hypnotism, and have been greatly struck by the way in which, for a hundred and fifty years, the world has refused to take serious cognizance of the discoveries of Mesmer, Braid, Esdaile, and the rest.

Partly because of the prevailing materialism and partly because of prevailing respectability, nineteenth-century philosophers and men of science were not willing to investigate the odder facts of psychology for practical men, such as politicians, soldiers and policemen, to apply in the field of government. Thanks to the voluntary ignorance of our fathers, the advent of the ultimate revolution was delayed for five or six generations. Another lucky accident was Freud’s inability to hypnotize successfully and his consequent disparagement of hypnotism. This delayed the general application of hypnotism to psychiatry for at least forty years. But now psycho-analysis is being combined with hypnosis; and hypnosis has been made easy and indefinitely extensible through the use of barbiturates, which induce a hypnoid and suggestible state in even the most recalcitrant subjects.

Within the next generation I believe that the world’s rulers will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging and kicking them into obedience. In other words, I feel that the nightmare of Nineteen Eighty-Four is destined to modulate into the nightmare of a world having more resemblance to that which I imagined in Brave New World. The change will be brought about as a result of a felt need for increased efficiency. Meanwhile, of course, there may be a large scale biological and atomic war — in which case we shall have nightmares of other and scarcely imaginable kinds.

Thank you once again for the book.

Yours sincerely,

Aldous Huxley”

Letters of Note blog here.