Category Archives: BLOGGERY: articles of interest from elsewhere………

Feedback Loop: Extra Virgin

Occasionally, the way I indulge my urges – mainly rambling diatribes here, or acts of violence in sessions and fetish clubs – provoke interesting responses by email. With permission, I will post some of the best on the blog.

Here’s the gentleman Lujan’s reply to last month’s “Extra Virgin” post:

“You are making a special point I know. But wondering if you have heard of the meaning ‘virgin’ may have had in the ancient world? Some people argue it meant “Not owned by a man” or `free’. As `dominant’ might be an extreme of `free’, I think its not surprising that you dream of our most sacred virgin. Also explains perhaps all those virgin Goddesses like Athena etc. I think it meant that they were powerful, free figures, not owned by patriarchy, or pre-patriarchal. That makes Mary even more special to us, a clue where she came from.  So perhaps she is more inspiring than some think, in her unassuming yet subversive way. Mary Mother of God. Our greatest monarch Elizabeth I, no stranger to sex we’re sure, most defiantly a Virgin Queen in the true sense of the word.

Winston Churchill described Joan of Arc as the most impressive person to have lived in the last 1000 years. Pretty hard to think of anyone, ever, to match her courage, leadership and compassion. In France she is the `Virgin of Orleans’. She may have been a sexual virgin, but certainly was the virgin of pre-history, the independent goddess like woman, owned by no one. She remains the youngest person to have commanded a nations armed forces. A 17 year old daughter of a farmer, commanding France’s nobility & patriarchy’s elite . Dealing the decisive blow at Patay that destroyed the English chances of conquering France, ending 100 years of pointless patriarchal warring. Sorry to go on, but certainly makes me think about the ancient, and probably sub-conscious power of the title Virgin, and of its ongoing meaning. If we can overlook patriarchy’s corruption of the word, it stands for greatness, and its true root meaning is probably `free’, and subconsciously we may well be remembering that.

Interesting also in the context of one of your other blogs, about how we love to diminish the sacred feminine . Still today men strive to dismiss The Maiden’s achievements, to dismiss her as mad. History must not recall that a 17 year old woman beat men at their favourite game, and crushed the ambitions of England in France.

Such a shame Virgin lost its underlying meaning today. But thrilling to think of its subconscious power and meaning, and what it might mean in our dreams, or your dreams.”

Read the original “Extra Virgin” article here.

In Your Facebook

Alarming piece from Jezebel.com:

‘According to Dr. David J. Ley of Psychology Today, Facebook has started deleting several “pages of several women and female sexuality organizations,” including the page of Self Serve, “a women-owned and run sexuality resources center.”

The women at Self Serve, Ley writes, had their page deleted after they posted an informational video about labiaplasty. The video, Ley notes, “has a heartfelt message, urging women to love their bodies as they are, and not to give in to mutilation to fit an unrealistic, and uncommon ideal based upon porn,” but apparently triggered the organization’s page removal from Facebook due to the fact that it contained pictures of vaginas. The context, it seems, was unimportant: the fact that vaginas were being shown was enough of a justification for Facebook to delete the page. Ley also notes that the page of sex columnist Violet Blue was also deleted, even though she “had worked hard to comply with Facebook’s rules. She was given no advance notice and no explanation of why her page was deleted.” Ley wonders if perhaps these deletions are indicative of a larger, scarier issue: that the site is intentionally targeting, and removing, women-run celebrations of the female body and female sexuality…’

Full article here.

Autumnal Cannibalism

This week, Channel 4 in the UK has been screening short “4Thought” films which ask “Is Homosexuality a Sin?” (Click here to view, until it falls off the internet.) One that caught my attention was Rev Peter Ould, a Church of England Minister. Having been exclusively gay as a young man, he claims to have had a personal revelation that made him leave homosexuality behind and discover “the man that God truly made [him] to be”.

“There was an amazing moment of insight for me,” he said, “when I realised that a lot of my homosexual attractions were actually cannibalistic… I was attracted to the kind of men that I wanted to be. Part of my moving on process – when I saw a bloke I was attracted to – was turning to God and saying: why am I attracted to that man; what is the thing that I feel is lacking in me?”

“That bloke’s cock,” I answered flatly, addressing the telly.

However, it got me thinking about cannibalistic desire. I’m not talking about people who literally eat other people. I mean cannibalism in the same sense that the Reverend does though, unlike him, I believe that it isn’t merely a gay thing but is, instead, the basis for all human desire.

A vital part of attraction to anyone, of any gender, is that you admire them in some way. That person must possess qualities, whether behavioural, physical or mental, that appeal to you. Even in evolutionary terms, it’s common to choose a partner on the basis of the potential traits they can pass on to your own future offspring. Not only do you seek someone whose genes you may want to stir into your own and cast into the next generation, but you also want to assimilate aspects of your lover into yourself. There is so much to learn and experience from this marvellous human being you’ve discovered. When you desire someone, you fancy, covet and crave them in every way.

If you watch QI, you might have heard of the Anglerfish. The female is far bigger than the male, and he latches on to the side of her body with his teeth, then releases an enzyme which fuses his mouth to her. Slowly, the tiny male withers away until he is almost completely absorbed into her and only his gonads remain. It’s beautifully symbiotic.

A sub once told me that when he serves a dominant woman, he imagines what it is like to be her. He basks in her power. Just as I once wrote a couple of years ago about the kick I get from empathising with my masochists, they often experience something startlingly similar, wanting to see themselves through the eyes of their captor. We feed off one another.

I can only speculate about what kind of relationships, if any, the freshly heterosexual Reverend now has. He says in the interview that he became “aware” of women, yet does that count as genuine attraction? If we hunger for a person, however metaphorically and whatever their gender, are we cannibals – and is denying our cravings a form of emotional, sexual and spiritual anorexia? If a lover craves us in return, is that a happy symbiosis or mutual destruction? Is desire really so sinful?

These aren’t questions that I, or possibly anyone, can answer, but in the meantime here’s “Autumnal Cannibalism” by Salvador Dali: