Category Archives: BLOGGERY: politics, religion & brain purges……

Excuse My Dust

Dorothy Parker died on this day, 1967.

Many Dominatrices, myself included, hold Parker up as an influence, an inspiration and an icon. A prolific writer, she was famously acerbic and we have many quotable examples of her cynical – sometimes cruel – wit. Her private life was often somewhat tumultuous. She was married twice, took a number of lovers, and for many years battled her own insecurity, depression and alcoholism, yet always hid her troubles behind a brilliant but vicious sense of humour. Her long-term friend S J Perelman affectionately described their first encounter as “a scarifying ordeal”. Parker was active in Civil Rights and Anti-Fascist organisations, and as a result, the NAACP claimed her remains in 1988 and erected a memorial garden in her honour, with a plaque that reads as follows:

“Here lie the ashes of Dorothy Parker (1893–1967) humorist, writer, critic. Defender of human and civil rights. For her epitaph she suggested, ‘Excuse my dust’. This memorial garden is dedicated to her noble spirit which celebrated the oneness of humankind and to the bonds of everlasting friendship between black and Jewish people. Dedicated by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. October 28, 1988.”

Read some of the best known Dorothy Parker quotes here.

Body and Soul

Sex and spirituality are being celebrated in the Philippines this month. The Arts In The City festival has brought together dancers, musicians, artists and many more of the international creative community for live performances, workshops and exhibitions. Among the attractions in Pasay City is “Body and Soul”, a show by sculptors Agnes Arellano and Duddley Diaz. The follow-up to their 2007 “Angels and Goddesses” exhibition, this collection examines the sacred nature of sexuality and is inspired by myth, religion and the erotic temples in Khajuraho, Northern India.

“Being an ardent student of the tantras and longtime lover of the human form,” said Arellano, “I was in bliss as I recreated some inspiring scenes, zooming into particular details in extreme close-up and syncretising these through the church windows of my Catholic girlhood…”

Using the image of the monstrance (the vessel in which communion wafers are presented) Diaz also attempts to reconcile Roman Catholicism with overtly sexual deities such as Eros and Psyche: “My thoughts wanted to go as far back in time as possible to trace the history of erotic literature in the old world… The monstrance itself is in bronze and contains details of some of the erogenous parts of the body in alabaster. From afar, the luminosity of the alabaster piece and the monstrance-inspired motif puts us in a quasi-sacred state or an ecclesiastical setting.”

Read more about the Arts in the City fetsival from the Philippine Star here, and see more from the Galleria Duemila here.

Lashed

The latest Dominatrix “memoir” to be released is denounced at its own launch party. This could either be a publicity stunt or a promotional disaster. I suppose we’ll never know…

From the Sydney Morning Herald:

‘The story behind Madame Lash’s no-show at her book launch varies wildly depending upon who you talk to. On Monday night the Sydney dominatrix left the author of her biography Madam Lash: Gretel Pinniger’s scandalous life of sex, art and bondage ”standing at the altar” when, at the last minute, she deputed her chauffeur to read a statement denouncing the book as lies. ”The chauffeur read out a statement saying it was character assassination,” says the jilted author Sam Everingham, who, though sympathetic to his subject, is having none of it. ”[But] I gave her a copy of the manuscript in October, and she read it in January, and we workshopped it together, and she did an edit with me.” Everingham says that Ms Lash was ”excited and happy” with the advance copy he sent her. He says the real reason she has backed away from the book, and all subsequent publicity, is because her financial security has become imperilled. Everingham said the only income she has received is $1000 to $3000 a month through the estate of a deceased patron (named by Private Sydney’s Andrew Hornery as the billionaire Lord Paul Hamlyn), and that Ms Lash’s brother told him she feared financial ruin if she backed a book in which that relationship was mentioned. To put it mildly, Ms Lash disputes his account. She would not be drawn about her finances, but told the Diary she was neither happy nor excited about an advance copy. ”I can’t begin to tell you the outrage it is. I cannot read the book without total nausea. I’ve got to page 84. It’s like identity fraud. I thought I was getting an art biography.”’