Category Archives: BLOGGERY: articles of interest from elsewhere………

Equestrienne

I’m allergic to horse hair. I discovered this many years ago when a friend took me to her stable and I had a very embarrassing swollen-eyed, streaming-nosed asthma attack. This was unfortunate. I love animals, and to find myself limited as to which species I could befriend was devastating.

Still, get me a saddle and bridle and I can make do with human equivalents. About a year ago, I slipped into a pair of jodhpurs, took up my riding crop and spent a pleasant afternoon trotting round the dungeon on a pony boy. He may not have been as lovely as a real horse but at least he posed no danger of anaphylactic shock.

Anyway, here’s part of a fascinating essay called “Horse Lust” by Gloria Mitchell, published at Nerve.com:

“…Pornography sometimes makes use of the equestrian motif: the slave is strapped into position, perhaps gagged; the master or mistress wears boots and carries a riding crop. Sometimes the reference is quite literal: a dark-haired dominatrix sits astride a muscular fellow and pulls reins attached to his headgear. All this ought to be appealing to someone with a childhood fetish for the smell and creak of leather, the metallic jingle of riding accouterments and the mystique of controlling or being controlled. And it is, sort of. But ultimately, “You are my slave, you belong to me, you must do as I tell you,” seems to lack drama. People who really engage in such activities have told me that the dynamics are not so clear — the sweet, submissive young thing relates how she persuaded her master to let her tie him up. Still, despite such self-conscious crossings of self-imposed boundaries, the participants seem to like defining the relationship in terms of symbiotic need, rather than murky, changeable desire. It strikes me that there is an unwillingness, on both sides, to take risks. Compare this to riding a horse. Riding a horse may be a kind of mastery, but the reason it is exciting is that the rider is not in complete control. Perched atop this great, strong animal, you know that you could be thrown off and trampled. You have expectations of the horse — you trust it and think you can govern it — but the horse has not signed any agreement with you. (Instead, you have signed an agreement with the stable owners releasing them from liability for your injury or death.) The bigger, faster and more active the horse is, and the wider the ground over which you can ride, the more exhilarating the experience. (That was another flaw in my real riding sessions, as I recall now. They were too restricted, and didn’t measure up to the fantasy of a graceful canter or a wild gallop over endless fields.) What you want from the experience is suspense, uncertainty, possibility. In contemplating those scenes of dominance and submission, I have to wonder: if riding a horse can be so complicated, why should sex be any less so…?”

Full article here.

Brooklyn Kinda Love

Here’s part of a brilliant article by Jon Bershad for Mediaite.com about Playboy TV’s new “Porn Women Will Actually Watch” show:

“Many, including my mother, have tried to explain to me how Playboy is insulting to women. I’ve never really understood it. Then, a month ago, Playboy TV announced it was developing a new series that was specifically designed to increase their female demographic. Today, the first ad for one such show, Brooklyn Kinda Love, appeared and we can now see what Playboy TV thinks women like: inane, reality television. Oh, now I get it. That is insulting.

Yeah, for everyone who watches reality shows like Jersey Shore and thinks to themselves, “Man, this is a totally good way for me to spend my time on Earth but I sure wish I could see the genitals of these walking disasters,” Playboy TV has the show for you. It’s a series that follows four typical Brooklyn couples. You know the type: young, tattooed, and willing to have sex on camera for the financial gain of a giant corporation. Basically, you could have scooped any of them off the L Train and they’d be like that. However, most importantly, in between all that uncensored sex, they’ll be talking about relationships and feelings and stuff for all the ladies in the audience…”

Full article and trailer for “Brooklyn Kinda Love” here.

Boobs, Bums, Burlesque

It’s official. Burlesque has become mainstream.

Christina Aguilera and Cher now star in a film called “Burlesque” that looks both titillating and deeply depressing in equal measure. As with Pro-Domming and any other industry that walks a difficult tightrope between exploitation and empowerment, modern burlesque can veer between the genuinely brilliant performances of those who remain true to its intended spirit, and the distasteful, degrading nonsense that often trades under its name.

The Channel 4 comedy “PhoneShop” captured this perfectly in one episode when the chaps were attempting to invite a woman to join them at the “chicken and tits for three quid” night  –

“Now it seems like a wet t-shirt contest, yeah, but to be truthful with you, it’s more like a… a… burlesque type thing,” says Jerwayne, staring down her top.

Ashley agrees.“It’s… like… your opportunity to advance positive perceptions of female empowerment in… like… a bi-gender context, you get me? Plus, there’s chicken.”

“And a free dildo,” adds Jerwayne.

Quite. Laurie Penny wrote an excellent and provocative article for the Graun this week, headed “This jiggle-fest has nothing to do with sex or power”. I’d recommend giving it a read before making your mind up either way.

In the meantime, here’s the trailer:

What do you think?